Monday, September 29, 2014

Assignment 6:Create Your Own Adventure

What interests you? What is your point of exigence? What's on your mind?  What do you want to chat about? Rant about? Learn about?

'Cause really, isn't it all about you? <wink wink nudge nudge>

This week, create three writing prompts that you find most intriguing. Then, choose one prompt and respond to it.

Note:
Please don't make the other prompts "dummy" prompts - I'll be revisiting these options later next semester.

Ready...
Go!

Due Sunday, October 5th at 11:59 pm

Sunday, September 28, 2014

Assignment 5 Ian Harrison (first prompt)

Why do I watch TV? Is it because I crave entertainment like some sort of junkie? Do I see value in what I see on TV? Or am I simply too bored or too lazy to be bothered to do anything else? All three are probably true to a certain extent. I think the phrase "to each his own" applies perfectly to the concept of television. Some watch for fun, some watch for meaning, some have no reason to watch at all. I personally like to think everything on TV has some cultural significance or value, though I understand that this is quite a stretch for some shows. I mostly watch comedies because I simply don't have the time or willpower to emotionally invest myself in a good drama. I use TV as a quick entertainment fix to relieve boredom or stress, but I fully appreciate and respect the power of shows that use the time allotted (or not allotted) to their advantage as far as a story is concerned. I currently am really enjoying Brooklyn Nine-Nine and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. While I realize I could be watching slow burning and long winded dramas, I simply don't want to invest so much time when the payoff can perhaps only be some sort of emotional toll, negative or positive, and even then, what if it decreases in quality and loses its luster? I am a huge movie fan, which is probably another reason I don't like to watch serious TV shows; why wait weeks or watch hours of footage to hear a story, when I can hear one, though not the same, perhaps just as interesting, entertaining, or thought-provoking, in less than three hours? Full disclosure, I really just don't have the attention span for a full season of a show that isn't nearly perfect, let alone five to eight. I'm happy to laugh at the same crazy characters getting into equally crazy shenanigans many a time, but I struggle to pay attention when a monstrous and intricate ten-season epic rears its head at me. In short, I watch TV mostly for entertainment. I appreciate the value of episodic storytelling, but it's just not my cup of tea.

Charlie Payne - Assignment 5

     I cannot comfortably say that I don't like TV; many television shows have moved me and I appreciate the power of a good series. The "TV is bad for you" mentality prevents many from enjoying good art, and seems to me to be too dismissive, despite many TV shows popular now being trash, opting to be low-risk money makers that dumb themselves down to try to reach as broad an audience as possible. Let's not forget about Freaks and Geeks, or Twin Peaks, or The X Files (at least a few seasons of it), or Wilfred. These shows are intelligent and creative and fresh and witty and succeed at establishing audience-character connections on an emotional level, while continuing to be widely accessible in bite-sized bits to people all across America.


    All that said, I can't think of the last time I sat down and watched TV just for the hell of it. I consider myself a fairly intelligent person, with a dormant thirst for knowledge and insight, and I find watching television as a pastime to be extremely consumptive and distracting. That isn't to imply that I refuse to fill my days with consumptive activity; consumption is part of learning and can be used to better yourself, in my opinion. The problem arises when someone starts a new show on Netflix with a full bag of Cheetos in their arms like a baby, and then the next minute Netflix has nothing more to offer and they look down at their once-white-now-orange shirt and four empty Cheetos bags and think "Wow, did I seriously watch two seasons of Breaking Bad back to back and not move from this chair for like 40 solid hours? Hell yeah, bro!" It's no mystery why America has an obesity problem. Television can be a highly enjoyable and relaxing indulgence, but it's still just that: an indulgence. Unfortunately, like junk food, most people don't think of it like that.

For the Love and Hate of Television- Raiffa S.

Internet Killed Television.

Also known as the CTFxC, a daily vlog channel on YouTube following the life of Charles Trippy. This is not the main focus of my post but his web series (if you wish to call it that) brings up an interesting idea: that television is becoming less and less prominent in our society and the internet is now taking up the spotlight.

Personally I don’t watch TV much anymore. The constant inundation of tacky commercials and overly scripted sitcoms is no longer entertaining. And why would you sit through 20 minutes of commercials when you can watch the same thing online with no commercials at your leisure? With Netflix and other streaming websites (both legal and illegal), the internet is basically doing Television’s job but better.

And (I guess this is more geared toward the Disney Channel style sitcoms but,) some TV shows are just so fake and unrealistic it’s unbearable I mean, c’mon, Dog with a Blog? Did you just get a rhyming dictionary and pick the first 2 words under an entry? God I hope that show was cancelled (no offense to anyone who likes that show but really?). With new content creators on YouTube and elsewhere there are literally no boundaries, no rules, no company telling you “You have to do this” or “That’s too risky, we won’t make money”. There’s so much free flowing creativity and ingenuity so you’re never stuck channel surfing for something interesting to watch. And maybe I’ve got a bit of bias and this isn’t really answering the prompt but sometimes the TV industry and popular media is just really… *efuifbegubveui* and kind of behind the curve. I’m sure there’s some things I can say about representation and other issues that TV doesn’t bother touching but I’m not going to cause wow opinions. 


So, no I don’t watch “TV” but I watch TV series (currently Agents of Shield and Legend of Korra since those are returning for new seasons right now), Television isn’t the best form of entertainment but it isn’t the worst, and people should appreciate Nobel Prize winners more cause wow can you do that???.

Skylar Mays- Assignment 5

I feel like television is a really broad term because of how much it holds and I think its wrong to associate every tv series as being over dramatized entertainment. There are a lot of shows whose genres don't even make it to Emmys. Ever seen CNN or FOX win an Emmy? Does that make its quality any less than Glee or Gossip Girl? I also think that when comparing Nobel prizes to Emmys you have to compare audiences as well. Typically high maintenance people are the ones that dedicate their lives to shows require bigger ceremonies where as people that enjoy knowing who won Nobel prizes typically are quitter.

Jacob Faulkner - Assignment 5

People watch TV to either be informed or entertained, one or the other. Maybe they watch news and get informed on the weather, or they watch Breaking Bad and get entertained on the story. Some TV shows are efficient in what they do, and some are not. For example, FOX news does a bad job in informing, and Jersey Housewives does a bad job at entertaining. FOX news and Jersey Housewives are great examples of inane time, and Breaking Bad is a terrific example of good entertainment. What the Emmy's say about our society is that people really do like watching TV, no matter how good or bad it is for you. That's not necessarily a really positive or negative thing. Many people will think differently on the matter, but to my opinion I don't think it's really either, it's just something that happens. TV is definitely alright in my book

For the Love and Hate of Television Post-Kimba Butts

    I don't really watch TV. Used to watch it quite a bit whenever I was younger since most of the things I liked came on TV: Spongebob, Teen Titans, That's So Raven, etc. Alas, most of the shows I watch, the ones previously listed as an example, have either ended or have lowered in quality. And as I grew older, I couldn't find shows that I could truly enjoy like I used.
    Now TV producers aren't entirely to blame (Though the ideas for most shows I've seen are kinda asinine). It also is due to me maturing and my tastes changing. Instead of watching a show where a Hispanic girl and her pet monkey teach me Spanish, I shifted over to watching superheroes beat supervillians; then to watching a people make drugs and give competition chemical baths. And that's just my choice of television. I also learned to love other things, things I couldn't do (or at least do well) as a kid, such as video games, sports, and the arts.
    All in all, the fact I don't watch TV just has to do with the thing that affects everything in someway: time. And with time comes change, for better of for worst. I change, TV shows change, and the people who watch TV change. For me it used to be a nice way to do whatever I wanted, whether it was learn or have a laugh. Now I have other ways to do that.
    And channel surfing isn't an option in my house. Unless you want to anger the three other people wanting to watch the same thing...  

Lucy Macfarlan The X-Files

I'll start this off by saying that I very rarely, if ever, watch real TV. Netflix on the other hand, I use very often. I  could  literally(I mean that) spend the rest of this blog post raving about the X-Files (Why don't you love me David Duchovny). But instead I  think it would be much more interesting to point out the fairly obvious phenomenon of television addiction and why it is so pervasive. Addiction is maybe a bit of a strong word but really many of us, myself included, spend far too much time watching our favorite TV shows and getting completely obsessed with the lives of the characters. I think one if the many reasons behind this is that it provides an escape from our everyday, banal lives. Instead of thinking about your English homework you can think about (okay watch someone else think about)  an outlandish government conspiracy to cover up contact with aliens. At this point in time it's a monumental trend in our culture to let other people think and create things for us to listen to and then unquestioningly accept (Fox News, etc.). This is why television is more popular than reading books among many people, it's much easier to just let a few people on a bright screen tell you what's happening and what it all  means. Similarly, it's much easier to just half pay attention to crappy tv than it is to actually put in the focus that reading a book, writing something, or other forms of entertainment. I love a good book but there are few things that I enjoy as much as coming home after a long day to an hour of David Duchovny talking about aliens.

TV Johnathan Morris

When the television was invented, only wealthy, high class people could afford them and rather than watch one of the like two channels that were available, they would put it in their living room so everyone that came into their house knew how rich they were. It was more of a status symbol than anything else. Nowadays nearly every family in America has a TV in everyroom of their house. Is walking to the family room to watch TV with your loved ones really that much of chore? Dont't get me wrong I love watching TV when I'm bored just as much as the next guy, but when did everyone having their own TV become so common? It's not common for every member of the household to have a refrigerator or microwave, which in my opinion are more of a necessity than a television. "But you can share those things" you might think. How hard is it to share a TV, something that has no real use in your life?

5 For the Love and Hate of Television-Mia Alexander

 Who cares about how much television we watch? I do. I watch it for several reasons: to relax, to learn, and to be lazy. I love Once Upon a Time, Scandal, and The Walking Dead. I talked with my boss today about church and service this morning and television somehow weaseled into the conversation. Her preacher pointed out how the show Revenge, which he had seen previews of, was crazy. If one watches the show Revenge, then they must have hate and malice in their hearts and want to do the horrible things in the show. I never saw television shows in this light.
So the Emmy's have more publicity than the Nobel Prizes. What does this say about our society? It proves that we are exactly how we everyone thinks we are. Superficial and egotistic. Both are ego boosts. The Emmy's though, it is superficial because it is placing value in fantasy rather than reality. The Nobel Prize awards genius and acuity with real life advances. I think this is good because there are the people who thrive on recognition with flashing lights and others who fly under the radar without much complaint. I still haven't decided if it is appropriate but it is what it is.

Assignment 5- For the Love and Hate of Television: Jessica Nelson

In our world plagued with an epidemic of violence and despair we welcome the distraction of shining lights and hollywood's latest starlet. Afterall when a spotlight is shined in our eyes we tend to be blinded. I think it is fair to say that most people are not happy with their life or at least with the state of our world. TV provides an escape. A good TV show immerses you into another world that usually falls into one of three categories: better than yours, worse than yours, or radically different than yours. The ones that are better than yours give us something to strive for, the ones that are word than ours make us thankful, and the ones radically different from ours expand our thinking. Do I think it's good to turn a blind eye to the issues of our world? No. But I do think that occasionally we should let our eyes see something else, not only so we don't get overwhelmed by the terrors surrounding us but also to put them into perspective.

For the Love and Hate of TV - Keanu Gomez



As the world continues to technologically progress, we see the growing television viewing population.  Along with this growth is the merging of television with our pop culture. Before, many people probably watched television as a source of news and information.  This has drastically changed ever since then. Television nowadays is more of a source of entertainment than anything else.  I believe that TV is a good source of entertainment. It can expand your perspective on things and let you dive into a journey that you couldn’t experience anywhere else. But yes, TV is also a very convenient way for advertisers to captivate the viewers’ attention. We see them take advantage of television. It is noticeable that different ads appear during different parts of the day or during special programming events. The advertisers cleverly select ads that would be more effective for the current audience. Even though ads have become ever more present in television today that is definitely not the only effect of TV. I enjoy watching mystery, action, and some comedy shows, but I am not a TV addict. If people watch TV on their spare time, then I would say that it is acceptable, but if TV has become an inseparable part of one’s life, then I would say that that is the point when it becomes an inane use of time.

Assignment 5: For the Love and Hate of Television--Amir Abou-Jaoude

Television is a relatively young medium, born in the 1950s, yet, during the sixty or so years that television has been part of American life, it certainly has had a huge impact on society. Americans were shocked when they heard of John F. Kennedy's assassination on television and wept when the Challenger disaster unfolded. Presidential debates have been broadcast on television, memorable advertisements have gone across the airwaves, and quality serialized stories have been told. Television reaches a huge audience, and is an effective way of disseminating information.

I  believe that only a limited number of comparisons can be drawn between the Nobel Prizes and award shows like the Emmys, because the two awards recognize achievements in vastly different fields. The Emmys celebrate achievements in television, while the Nobel Prizes honor literary, scientific, and political accomplishments. However, despite their differences in focus, the Emmys and the Nobel Prizes are alike in one regard--they are both awards, given arbitrarily. While I will admit that the Nobel Prize is the more prestigious award, one could argue to some extent that they are just as meaningless as the Emmys. Not every great writer has won a Nobel Prize for literature--F. Scott Fitzgerald, James Joyce, and Leo Tolstoy were among those who were snubbed--and not every great scientist has a Nobel Prize to his name--as of this date, Stephen Hawking has not won the award. There are plenty of television shows that, while they reflect quality programming, have not won an Emmy either. These awards are designed to bring attention to achievements in their respective fields, but they are both arbitrarily given.

The Emmys attract more attention, I believe, because the format of the awards show is designed for television. The celebrities in attendance waltz down the red carpet. Then, the actual ceremony begins, led by an emcee who fills the evening with jokes. The most anticipated awards are handed out last, forcing the audience to remain glued to the television until the winners are announced. This show is made with television in mind--the people behind the show want to attract the home viewers, and make them care about who wins and who loses.

I would bet that if Nobel Prizes were handed out in a similar fashion, more people would pay attention to them. If the Nobel Laureates came to Stockholm in expensive tuxedos and dresses and went down the red carpet, much more attention would be paid to the event. Still, when the Nobel Prizes are announced, there is no host making the audience laugh, and there are no presenters eagerly waiting to open the envelope. The Nobel Prizes are a quiet affair. They are not designed to be broadcast on television in front of millions.

Does this disparity between the Nobel Prizes and the Emmys say anything about our society? I don't think so. Still, it does say something about the power of television to spread information. Television makes the Emmys a huge event. Without the televised ceremony, we would be reading about the winners quietly in the news or hear about them on television. The lack of televised coverage makes the Nobel Prizes a smaller event. Since the Nobel Prize ceremony is not broadcast on CBS or ABC, we read about the winners quietly in the news. In reality, both are arbitrary awards, but television makes the Emmys more important to us than the Nobel Prizes. If anything, the contrast between the glamorous Emmys and the quietly announced Nobel Prizes tells us of the power of television.

Saturday, September 27, 2014

TV - Taylor Stewart

An interesting film I've viewed recently, "Antiviral", deals with the subject of celebrity infatuation, something that greatly motivates the Emmy/Nobel conundrum. The culture within the movie is so media-saturated that people pay to be injected with diseases celebrities have acquired, and the really devoted ones buy "meat" grown from celebrity cells (gross I know). While that's a pretty far stretch from nowadays, it still comments on the apparent obsession with celebrities. It's on Netflix FYI. Point is, people need their fix of celeb action. Drowning ourselves in the apparent drama and "reality" of reality television, or maybe the thoughtful plot of an excellent series, lets us get away from our own drab world.

But Nobel prizes? Nah, that's not interesting. It's certainly not covered as much as the Emmys or VMAs or anything, but that's just because networks know most people don't care about academic "celebrities" as much as anyone at the Emmys. 

For the Love and Hate of Television- Mikaela Gatewood


Television is a pretty prominent part of today's society. The majority of America regularly watches TV, most of the time on a daily basis. Personally, I don't watch it very much. If anything, I just binge watch seasons of shows on Netflix. However, I can see both the good and the bad parts of television as entertainment. On one hand, TV has a couple issues. It often times presents several negative and stereotypical views on groups such as women, African Americans, etc. Reality TV shows are especially guilty of this, with shows such Keeping Up With The Kardashians, or networks like MTV that have several shows depicting girls getting trashed in clubs, or getting worked up over seemingly trivial things. Even sitcoms are perpetrators, often having stupid female characters. They not only further previous stereotypes about these groups, but also make it easier for people to make fun of or demean them. However, on the other hand, TV can be a great bonding experience. Even with the little TV that I watch, I’ve made several friends based off of our shared interest in specific TV shows alone. It’s a common media that everyone is able to easily talk about and connect with. Not only that, but families are able to spend time with each other just sitting down and watching TV together. About once a week me and my parents sit down and watch one of those cheesy crime shows together. It gives us a way to spend time together and ultimately bond over. This common connection among people helps further and broaden relationships, which I think is important to do. So, while television isn't my favorite form of entertainment, I still think it can have an important and useful role in our society. It just has a few problems to work out.  

For the Love and Hate of Television: Kayla Beebout


Many Americans these days say they are addicted to television.  They can’t stop watching their favorite show; they just have to see one more episode, one more episode, just one more.  OK, maybe one more.

And so it goes on. 

I like television, but I would not say that I am addicted to it.  I get on Netflix, watch one or two shows, and I’m usually done.  That’s how I was raised, really.  When I was a little kid, I was only allowed to watch one or two at a time, so that’s my natural inclination now.  I really do enjoy it, though.  It’s a chance to sit and immerse yourself in something other than your own life, and for someone who loves stories like I do, that is a very enjoyable thing.  I personally love shows that are not wholly based in reality, because I find the stories more original and compelling.  Doctor Who is one of my favorites, though sadly I have not seen any of the new season because we got rid of cable.  I also tend to like some documentary series and more informational television, because I can get something out of it but it is still interesting and engaging.

That being said, I dislike most reality TV shows because I personally think that if I can walk outside and watch a drama like that happen before my eyes, then what’s the point of sitting down and watching it at home (although if Cake Boss goes in that category, I really do enjoy that show)?  I also don’t like TV shows that portray teen life as an endless cycle of drama and immorality.

My family got rid of cable a few months ago, and I really like having Netflix and Amazon Prime, but I miss the news sometimes, and new seasons of shows I like.  The best part, though, is not having to deal with commercials.  I can watch the same number of shows, but spend less time doing it and get more enjoyment out of it.  Of course, I suppose the advertisers wouldn’t agree with my reasoning.

And now, back to your regularly scheduled programming.

TV- Andrew Hardy

A conversation over television and an implication of it's consumption would be a vast one. There's a huge amount of media that that term encompasses. I don't think it's appropriate to glorify or dismiss it as a whole. That said, it is definitely a consumptive process, which are not a productive as a productive process, and moderation prevents television form interfering with other parts of your life and inhibiting you from being produtive. I don't have cable or Netflix, and I think that helps me moderate much better. I also don't watch any television or movies while doing homework or eating, and I think that separation has been healthy for me because it makes it easier to practice mindfulness or sati (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(Buddhism)) of the present moment. It's also important to me to distinguish between what you're consuming. Reading Clique novels or Hemingway can both be enjoyable for people, but the latter I find to be more beneficial to me because it illustrates quality prose and contains more emotional resonance. As compared to the 19 novels in the Clique series, Hemingway's publications appear to be more honest then money grabbing techniques. Even the less literary authors I read like Tolkien, Pratchett, or Gibson offer fresh perspectives and interesting styles (Or at least I believe so.) I try to apply the same mentality to television consumption. I watch far from high-brow material, but the shows I enjoy Cowboy Bebop, The Wire, Neon Genesis Evangelin, or Twin Peaks are for the most part one or two seasons. They have good writing and cinematography, and provide a fresh perspective on subjects. Sometimes they introduce ideas to me I wouldn't consider. Serializing a story gives you a lot of room to explore storytelling, but I think it's important for that to not become gratuitous, especially for monetary gain. I can't claim watching these is anything more than entertainment, but I find it preferable to sinking hundreds of hours into Skins or Lost.

Assignment 5: For the love and hate of Television -Keionna Bailey

How can one possibly hate television? Watching TV is amazing you get to experience things outside of your world, you can see what life is like elsewhere. I watch TV because there's not too much you can do in Lexington, Ky. But even if I did live somewhere more exciting I would most likely watch the same amount of TV as I do now. I love getting so involved in a movie or television series to point where its like I'm a part of the process and I'm actually in the show. But the best part of Television is the shows. My favorite shows that are on right now are Scandal, Revenge, How to get away with Murder, Vampire Diaries, the 100,...etc. I could go on and on. And as you can see I love all different types of genres. I love the everything from reality and mystery suspense to sci-fi and fantasy. Whenever I watch a show it just makes me wonder, does all of this happen in real life? The one show I absolutely hate is The Walking Dead! That show is just like one long movie that needs to end and I don't know why so many people like it. I feel like nothing ever really gets accomplished and the same things happen every season.

 A lot of people watch TV for the news and politics but I'm not a fan of either one. The news reporters always have to report the most negative events that are happening which is just depressing and if I wanted to know about politics I would go online or just go downtown and listen to debates. And some even wonder why more people would rather watch entertainment award shows rather than ground breaking educational awards show. And it might seem like I'm being hateful but in my opinion television is more for the entertainment business. When people come home from work and school they want to unwind and laugh they don't want to watch some show that just makes it seem like they never actually left work.

Friday, September 26, 2014

Jesse Konopka, Assignment 5: TV

Personally, I believe that TV is more of a distraction than anything else. Some TV programs are a fantastic way to spread information. Others are great entertainment. However, the reason most people watch TV or even leave it on when performing other tasks is that humans hate pure silence. For most people there has to be a certain level of noise for them to feel comfortable. The only exception is when the human body goes to sleep. TV works off of this concept to attract attention. Even if the show is terrible most people will leave it on just to fill the silence.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Assignment 5: For the Love and Hate of Television: Thomas Stokes

Why do you watch TV? Why do you not? What shows do you love or hate? I don't really watch TV anymore. I don't really watch TV because its very mindless. Yes, sometimes there are occasions where TV watching can be enjoyable, but those occasions are ones where its like there is a TV special or season premier or something special like that. Those occasions are more like watching movies or having a party though. Id much rather watch a movie than watch TV. Another major reason why I've stopped watching TV is because of commercials and re-runs. Commercials take away from the overall enjoyment of watching TV because they barrage you with product information for things you don't even care about, all the while you just want to get back to your show. Its like a painful, miserable, 4 and a half minute break from your show where you listen to yourself complain about things rather than enjoy what your watching, which is the exact point of television. As far as shows go, I can't stand all the stupid reality shows or any of the over done, thoroughly overused cartoon templates (you know, two friends with similar levels of intelligence and a couple of other characters doing the same things over and over (see: Phineas and Ferb, or Spongebob)). As far as shows I like go, I don't think there are really any I can think of. I just kind of watch YouTube videos or Twitch livestreams of games.

Assignment 3: Come to the dark side, Luke: Thomas Stokes

I do not believe in absolute evil, or absolute good. Many people that are good have done bad things, and vice versa, many people that are bad have done good things. One example is Aang and Zuko from Avatar, the Last Airbender. In one episode, Aang, the savior of the four nations, lies to two conflicting tribes of people in order for them to get along, and also accidentally burns his first fire bending master; Zuko on the other hand is a banished prince sworn to capture Aang to restore his honor to the Fire Nation, and later in the series (spoiler alert) becomes Aang's fire bending master after realizing his father, the fire lord, is basically crazy, and he needs to help Aang take him down. However, there are many examples of completely neutral parties. These parties aren't morally aligned with either absolute good or absolute evil. One of these examples is the non-bending citizens in season 1 of Legend of Korra, which is the sequel series to Avatar, the Last Airbender. They are a neutral party because they simply want to make a living in the world, but are put behind those with bending.

Assignment 2: iWrite: Thomas Stokes

Has technology affected you in a majorly positive way? What happened? I feel like technology has helped me majorly in a positive way. Ever since I was little, my older brother always seemed like he knew everything to me. He was always tinkering, taking apart my father's old eMachine, or pulling apart Nerf Guns, he was always doing something. This heavily influenced me while I was growing up. Since a young age I aspired to become as adept as him at this "tinkering" or "deconstructing" and this finally culminates in my building of my own computer during the 8th grade. I still use that computer today, even if I have replaced some of the parts, its still the same computer to me. Im writing this post on it now, and Ill probably write all my blog posts on it. In this matter technology has given me my goals. Another way technology has helped me is that it lets me connect with my friends, no matter where they are. Whether it be Skype or Steam, Im always talking to my friends, or playing something with them; like Magic: the Gathering. Technology has always helped to improve my quality of life.

Assignment 1: Howdy: Thomas Stokes

Im Thomas Stokes. My personal goals are to go through the school year without too much turmoil, and to involve Magic: the Gathering in all of my blog posts this year. The most meaningful moment of my summer vacation was probably getting my restricted license and being able to drive freely. If I could have any one super power, it would be the power to move really fast, like quicksilver from XMen or the Flash. One of my favorite hobbies is Magic: the Gathering, and I tend to be fairly competitive as far as playing against others go. One of the more easy going series to watch is spellslingers, episode one is here:

For the Love and Hate of Television-Sydney Taylor

I find television to be a very entertaining and still useless way to waste time. I'm writing this while also watching The Big Bang Theory. Netflix is my worst addiction, even worse than caffeine. Instead of just one more Red Bull, it's just one more episode of Orange is the New Black. I love movies too and they're a lot less commitment, but there's just something about getting wrapped up in an intense story that you know keeps going on. The characters start to feel like family. Ending a series is always a depressing day. I like television because it distracts me from my life and makes me forget about everything for a little while. Or a long while. Everyone in television shows seems to be having an overly interesting life, and it makes me feel like mine is even more boring. Maybe if I actually went out and did things instead of sitting around the house watching television I wouldn't feel like that. Oh well. Back to counting the days until the season 5 premiere of The Walking Dead. 

A World in Pictures-Sydney Taylor

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in Manhattan, New York City on March 25, 1911 was a tragic occurrence that caused the deaths of 146 people-23 men and 123 women-most of whom were Jewish and Italian immigrants. Because the owners locked all doors to stairwells and exits to prevent unauthorized breaks, when the building caught fire everyone was trapped and led many victims to jump from the building in an attempt to escape. The factory fire led to the establishment of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union and the creation of legislation aimed at improving factory conditions and safer working conditions for workers. The Asch Building, now known as the Brown Building, has been declared a National Historic Landmark and a New York City landmark. It's a terrible thought that 146 workers had to perish in order for people to make a change in the lives and well-being of factory workers, but at least their suffering wasn't in vain.

For the Love and Hate of Television- Tora Sellers

                I have not been a serious watcher of television in several years. There isn't a single event or reason why I have stopped watching TV.  Way back when I used to be a regular TV viewer, I gradually lost interest in the programming; sitcoms like the Big Bang Theory were cheesy and unamusing, and the popular dramas were unoriginal and boring. Around this same time, I gained an interest in film and music. Gradually at first, then almost completely, films, music, and TV dramas (good ones, like Breaking Bad or The Sopranos) replaced TV programming.  This might be because most popular TV shows try to reach as large of an audience as possible.  The easiest and cheapest way to do this is to create an unoriginal and accessible show, and the more difficult route being to create an engaging and unique show. Television networks, wanting a low-risk money maker, usually favor the former. Perhaps this is why  I abandoned television with very little regrets. 

Monday, September 22, 2014

Assignment 5: For the Love and Hate of Television

The Emmy Awards (aired about a month ago) are kind of a big deal. Not a big deal in that life-altering-kind-of-way, but a big deal in the sense that a lot of celebrities dress up, that a lot of companies pay more money in advertisements, and a lot of people stop watching reruns.

The Emmys are not the only award extravaganza of the season though. During the first week of October, without the advertising, paparazzi, or celebrities, the Nobel Prizes are announced. But how many people are listening? With the Emmys comes television's fall lineup, but what does the common person get after the announcement of the Nobel Prize in physics?

So, what are your thoughts? Choose one or two or all of the following prompts:

Why do you watch TV? Why do you not? What shows do you love or hate?

Does TV provide a good form of entertainment? Is it just a convenient delivery system for advertisers to send their messages to the masses? Is it an inane use of time? Can it be all three?

What does it say about our society that the Emmy's have so much glitz and attention and the Nobel Prizes are quietly announced in the news? Is this bad? Good? Appropriate?


Check out these sites for more information:



Positive Benefits of TV on Toddlers and Children

Due Sunday September 28th at 11:59 pm 

Sunday, September 21, 2014

These are a cycle of Magic: the Gathering cards. These particular cards were first debuted at PAX Prime on August 30th at the Khans of Tarkir discussion panel. These specific cards are called "fetchlands" because they search your library for other cards. This makes them extremely valuable as they help you get the cards you need earlier in the game. When these 5 cards were announced, the community of Magic: the gathering players went crazy! Many of the prominent Magic players promptly took flight to twitter and other social media sites to exclaim their animosity at this announcement, such as Brian Kibler or Louis-Scott Vargas, both of whom are regarded as incredibly skilled magic players. Now when I saw the fetchlands get announced I was instantly thrilled and became extremely excited for the set of cards that would have the fetchlands, Khans of Tarkir. The fetchlands would mean that I could create better decks and create better strategies for existing decks that I already had! It was like a miracle had happened!

Assignment 4: A World in Pictures- Mia Alexander



A mother and her children pretend to have been shot at the Westgate mall shooting exactly a year ago in Nairobi, Kenya


This picture startled me when I first saw it on the news last year. The first things that came to mind were that I hope they are just pretending and "where is this?" . When I got the full story it still broke my heart because of the circumstances which they survived. There were many people in the mall that day that did not make it but this family did. I think what comforted America about this picture was that the mother was with her kids first and foremost. Almost everyone can relate to the attachment of one's mother and fewer can relate to the mother role itself. This picture enforces the idea of family cohesiveness and brings to the surface that unthinkable situation in which one loses their children, their parent,  or their spouse. This picture not only comforts, it also terrifies the viewer. The image is a reality check. Not everybody made it out safe. Kenya was changed forever because not only was innocence stolen from children that day. Lives of children and adults, who thought it was a normal day, were taken. Like other terroristic attacks, this will shape the lives of everyone involved, remaining in the back of everyone's mind. That terrible day brought nations together to try and pick up the pieces and I will never forget how this picture in particular made me feel.

Lucy Macfarlan

This Photograph was taken on August 26th 1920, when the 19th amendment was passed, granting women the right to vote. The joy and pride that these women felt in this monumental accomplishment is evident in their smiles and triumphant flags raised in the air. To me and to many women the addition of this amendment, and by extension this photograph, represent the beginning of women's voices finally being heard. The women in the photograph and their mothers and grandmothers had been denied a right that was seen as second nature to most men. They fought a long and difficult battle to put themselves and their posterity in a position to make a change to the existing patriarchal social order, and set the ball rolling for women of the future to continue to narrow the gender gap (more of a giant chasm really) and to push for women's rights in the workplace, home, etc.

Charlie Payne - Assignment 4












     The 1960's was a decade ripe with counterculture movements, whether it be something as earth-shattering as the Civil Rights Movement or as controversial and unorganized as the hippie movement, but all these things came to an apex in 1969, the year of Woodstock. "Three Days of Peace and Music"can be found on t-shirts in Wal-Marts everywhere, but it isn't immediately obvious why the festival is so famous and important. Sure, almost every great musician of the 60's played there, from Hendrix to the Who to Ravi Shankar, etc, but more important than the actual content of the festival was the attitude of the festival. With the war in Vietnam still going on and the protests of that being met with violence across the U.S., Woodstock's attitude of free love and peace on earth was refreshing and highly influential to anyone who attended. Joints were passed and acid orange juice was consumed, but in the end the people's willingness to love and accept everyone of all races and to be non-judgemental was really where the counterculture shone through.

A World in Pictures- Mikaela Gatewood

The picture V-J Day (Victory Over Japan Day) in Times Square was originally taken on August 14th, 1945. It was taken by Alfred Eisenstaedt and was originally published in Life magazine. The picture shows a sailor kissing a nurse in the middle of Times Square, just after President Harry Truman announced the end of the war against Japan. As told by the photographer, the sailor in the picture had been running around Times Square kissing every woman he could find. Soon he came upon the nurse and kissed her just as the photographer took the picture. The photo soon became famous almost instantaneously and a cultural icon. The photo not only shows the joy, but the relief of officially ending World War II. By August of 1945, the only part of World War II that had not ended was the war over Japan and the Pacific Islands. With the surrender of Japan, the war was officially over. The picture truly reflects the jubilance of the nation and the world over no more violence or fighting, and comforted it's audience in the thought of peace instead of war. It had a profound impact and still leaves behind the idea of happiness in times of triumph and peace. 

A World in Pictures - Keanu Gomez


Aftermath of the 1st explosion

The morning of the April 13, 2013 started out like any other great morning in the United States. For some, it might have been even more special because of the celebration of Patriots’ Day in Maine and Massachusetts. It was a great three-day weekend where both parents and students had no work or school.

Unfortunately, this bright and promising day was about to disappear.

One of the most anticipated events on this day was the Boston Marathon. And about two hours after the 1st place winner had crossed the finish line, two pressure cooker bombs near the finish line exploded with a 13 second interval between them. These bombs killed 3 people and injured an additional 264 others. The marathon was halted immediately and all forms of transportation were disabled.

A few days after the bombings, Chechen brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev were reported to have killed an MIT policeman, carjacked an SUV, and initiated an exchange of gunfire with the police of Watertown, Massachusetts. During these events, Tamerlan Tsarneaev was shot multiple times and was killed by his own brother having run over him with the stolen SUV. Soon after, Dzhokhar was captured and interrogated by the police. He apparently blamed his dead brother as being the mastermind of the operation and their motives were identified by a note hanging on the wall of the boat where Tamerlan was hiding. It was revealed to have said “retribution for U.S. military action in Afghanistan and Iraq” and it claimed the Boston victims as “collateral damage”.

Although the numbers don’t compare to the damages during other events like 9/11, this event still evidently shocked our nation. For a terrorist attack to occur on the day America commemorates the anniversary of the first battles of the American Revolutionary War, is indeed unfortunate. But it is through catastrophic events like this where our nation is best united. After the Boston Marathon Bombings, some remembrance events were held in other states including, a nearly one month long cross country run to the Boston Marathon finish line starting from Venice Beach, Los Angeles, California.

Assignment 4: A World in Pictures--Amir Abou-Jaoude

One afternoon in 1937, in the small Spanish Basque town of Guernica, the church bells began ringing. Guernica had been a safe haven in the chaos of the violent Spanish Civil War--as of yet, it had witnessed no destruction. After all, the town held nothing that was remotely of  value to the fascist or communist cause. Guernica prided itself on its busy markets, and on that afternoon, most people were out shopping.

The church bells, however, served as a harbinger of doom. A fleet of planes soon dominated the skies. Hundreds of bombs were dropped on the small town, killing thousands and causing irreparable damage. At first, it was unclear why the town was attacked. The bombing was a joint effort between the forces of fascist General Franco and Nazi Germany, and years later, masterminds behind the attack revealed that it had no strategic purpose. It was simply carried out to inflict terror on the civilians of Spain. Here is a photograph from the aftermath of the bombing.
Around the time of the bombing, the Spanish Cubist Pablo Picasso had been commissioned to create an artwork for the 1937 World's Fair in Paris. He was asked to create something with a Spanish theme, to celebrate his homeland's national heritage. Picasso experimented with some characteristic Spanish imagery, rendering bulls and horses in his trademark abstract style. Still, his sketches were uninspired, and he continued searching for a powerful subject for his painting. Then, he read about what had happened in Guernica.
Guernica - Picasso (1937)
This is Picasso's rendition of events, a huge mural simply called Guernica. Though this is simply a painting, and not an eyewitness account of the actual destruction in the town, I would argue that it is more powerful and affecting. The Spanish imagery that Picasso had wanted to include is here. However, the horse and the bull are no longer symbols of a proud Spanish heritage. Rather, they cry out in anguish. Women cry over their dead children, men lie massacred on the ground. A lifeless electric light, possibly representing the bombs, hangs over the proceedings. This image conveys the destruction of warfare. Its monochromatic color scheme creates a somber mood. Small black lines representing newspaper print give texture to the painting. 

This is not Picasso's only notable painting. In 1907, he dramatically changed the conception of the human form with his Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. Still, works like this were purely experimental--they were created to tear down artistic conventions and introduce a new abstract aesthetic. While these works were heralded as innovative by some, critics believed that the new, cubist art was cold. It was simply an experiment, and it lacked the power to truly affect a viewer.

Guernica proves those skeptics wrong. Picasso was able to use his abstract style to create a work that expresses anguish. One cannot look at the painting without feeling sympathy for the mother who cradles her dead child in her arms. Another remarkable element of the painting is that Picasso reinvented artistic conventions for the modern age. The mother and child resembles the age-old image of the Pieta, and numerous artists such as Peter Paul Rubens had previously created allegories on the nature of war. Picasso updates these tropes to make them fit into the context of Guernica--a modern event, brought on with the tools of modern warfare.

If Picasso's painting did not exist, Guernica would have likely been forgotten. The description of the bombing may have been sensational at the time, but the events that occurred in the Spanish Basque town became dwarfed by the mass bombings of London and the ultimate destruction at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even the photograph taken at the time seems relatively ordinary in the context of World War II. However, Picasso's work reminds us of the horrific nature of this event. Guernica is worth more than a thousand words, and for that matter, a thousand photographs showing the destruction in the town. Truly, Picasso is the candle bearer, entering the room, shedding light on the events. His monumental work allows us never to forget the folly of destruction and the horrors of war.